Site best viewed at 1024x768 with a non-Internet Explorer browser... because IE sucks and you know it.
musician, composer, percussionist, educator, writer, artist, all-around imaginator.

Art, Stories, 'n' Stuff... BLAH, BLAH, BLOG


April 15th, 2010 by Phillip Ginn

So.

I just flipped through my first comic using Marvel’s iPhone comic reader app. I haven’t read a mainstream comic in a long time, favoring more independent stuff and manga (that’s another story). I have to say, it’s very good looking. The comics are clear and easy enough to read. Navigation is pretty straightforward and easy. There are a bunch of settings you can use to customize your reading experience.

But I don’t know if I like it.

I’m no luddite, and I’m not opposed to technological progress (though I am skeptical about usage, but, again, that’s another story). But when I read comics, I want to read a story that was designed with the reading format in mind. Granted, Marvel is offering print comics in a digital format that is small enough for your pocket, and they’ve done a decent job of circumventing the problems of the iPhone as a comics reader. But, I’m missing a few things that I love about the comics artform in print:

1. Layout
When I read a print comic, the first thing my eye sees is a page layout. I get to see how the next part of the story was designed overall, how it will flow from one sequence to another, and to see how that layout affects the emotional conveyance of that point in the story. Whether it’s a simple, grid layout or something with more of a dynamic, flashy design, the layout has an affect on how the sequence will be read and it can impact how the reader interprets the sequence emotionally. In order to gain this experience in the Marvel app, you have to go into settings and elect to see the full page upon entering each new one, otherwise this is lost in the app because, by default, we see one panel at a time, and for big splash pages, we see one section of the page at a time until we’re done reading the page, at which point the reader then shows you the full page. Then, at least for me, “letterboxing” needs to be turned off, which will unhide the surrounding panels of the page as you go from panel to panel. This way, you can read through the page with the knowledge that you are, in fact, reading a comic page.

The problem here is that, by default, full page view is turned off and letterboxing is turned on, both by default. I wonder if the designers think that this type of setting is supposed to provide a better digital reading experience. Maybe it’s just me. But, from my point of view, I know that what I’m reading was designed to be read in print, and therefore, since I’m not reading a story designed specifically for the app, my expectation is to read the comic in a manner that is as close to reading a print comic as possible.

2. Navigation and closure
Even after turning on full page view and turning off letterboxing, there is still navigation to consider. The iPhone is pocket-sized, so there are going to be some concessions when reading these comics. By default, animated navigation is turned on. This involves sliding from one panel to another, fading, and zooming. I personally hate any kind of motion in comics, even navigational transitions (comics is a static medium. This boundary helps define the medium. Yet another story), so I turned off the animation, which means each new readable section is presented almost instantaneously. The latter is much more tolerable. With the animation turned on, my pace of reading is very much in hands of a) my own reading pace, and b) the time it takes to animate the transition. With animation turned off, I read at my own pace and transition at my own pace.

We do lose a bit of closure here, in terms of seeing how one panel is separated from the juxtaposed panel(s). The length of a panel, the space between them, and the borders all affect closure and interpretation of time. By transitioning from one panel to the next, or one section of a panel to the next, our sense of closure is affected: we can’t always read the entire wide panel because it’s too wide for the screen – unless you turn the iPhone to view it in landscape mode, but you’ll just have to turn it back again – and our sense of panel proximity is lost once the reader zooms in so that we can read the comic.

3. Non-linear reading
Ever read a comic and want to go back to a previous panel on the page? You can’t do that instantaneously, at least not that I’ve found. You can use gestures to scroll up and down the page. You have to press “back” (left side of the screen) until you get to the panel you want to see again. This omission bugs me. If I can view the whole page at once and read it because the iPhone is so small, at least let me scroll through a page freely if I want to in addition to clicking forward and back.

I will say that browsing through the pages is easy. You can easily flip through pages much like you can flip through albums in artwork view in iTunes. However, the app automatically goes to landscape mode in order to do this.

Marvel did a decent job trying to bring the printed comic to the iPhone. I don’t have an iPad, so I can’t comment on that version of the app. I will say that, if you need a Marvel Comics fix, and you’re on the road, this app might do it for you. However, I wouldn’t use it as a default reader. Moreover, I’m not the type of guy to get my entertainment and pleasures any way I can get it: if I can’t have a good beer, I’ll go without; if I can’t watch a television show in my home on my actual television, I won’t default to a computer screen unless I can hook it up to the TV; if I can’t read a printed comic because I can’t afford to buy it, I’ll wait.

There are some webcomics that I really like. I don’t read them because they’re webcomics. I read them because their good. They don’t necessarily take advantage of digital technology in terms of their layout and design, but they aredesigned to be read on a webpage on a computer monitor and easily transferable to print. They’re also archived, which gives readers access to past strips for free (in many cases). I don’t have to read them by viewing one panel at a time because I can see the whole thing on my monitor. Even though they’re comics delivered in a digital format, I still wouldn’t want to read them on my iPhone.

For me, what I want to see out of portable digital comics is better use of the technology. If a creator has a webcomic or a print comic, perhaps there could be some exclusive portable content that is designed to be easily readable on a pocket-sized device while taking full advantage of the the size and technology, something that might read a little differently if it were to be delivered on a full webpage or in print. I think boundaries and limitations define a medium. Comics are static and silent. They use borders and space between panels to influence the perception of time and emotion. They use page layouts to affect the emotional impact of the page. When designing a portable digital comic, there are boundaries and limitations of the format to consider, too, just like there are for print. For portable digital comics, those include navigation, transition, resolution, and screen size. Creators should take advantage of these boundaries and limitations in order to have a much richer, fuller impact with their comics in a portable, digital format. Preparing a comic meant to be in print or for a large webpage isn’t necessarily going to translate well to the iPhone. The iPad, maybe, because the screen is bigger, but there are still other issues to consider.

Print is still my number one choice when it comes to reading, whether it’s the written word or comics. I like the experience better. It’s more intimate, more tangible. However, when I do read digital comics, I want to read something designed specifically for the format. I would have a much better reading experience in that case as opposed to trying to read a comic designed for a 6 X 9-inch printed page on a screen that’s about 2 X 3-inches in size.

No Comments »




April 7th, 2010 by Phillip Ginn

I recently had trouble with my contacts and calendar entries in Entourage: they disappeared. No backups on the PC side were current, so they were basically not useable. A sync from the iPhone meant the loss of all contacts on the iPhone. This lead to a full restore and the attempt to find a way to export the iPhone contacts (fail). After taking the risk and doing a post-restore sync, everything returned to normal.

I just emailed Apple some feedback. Here it is, as sent to Apple, warts and all:

Hello. I have a few comments regarding the iPhone, iTunes, and their related applications.

1. It would be convenient to be able to export the iPhone contacts to a .csv file straight from the iPhone. You may have received this feedback before. In worst case scenarios, this functionality could help restore a number of contact lists in various applications, such as Address Book, Entourage, Outlook, Gmail, etc., especially since a .csv file is a pretty universal way of important contacts from one application to another.

2. The option to restore iPhone data from a backup without going through a full restore should be available. In times when there is a problem with a loss of data, either on the iPhone or PC side, where a sync doesn’t help or actually makes this worse, data recovery from a backup could solve the problem. In these cases, a full restore isn’t really necessary when all that is required a simple data recovery. Case in point: you don’t always reinstall Mac OS X when restoring from backup files or using Time Machine, do you?

3. The option to have the iPhone overwrite the contacts and calendar entries on the PC should be available. Right now, only a sync or the option to have the PC overwrite the iPhone is available. In times when data problems are on the PC side, being able to restore from a perfectly fine iPhone would be a simple solution.

4. Address Book, Mail, and iCal could benefit from being a single power application, taking an example from Outlook and Entourage. Information from each sub app can be kept in a three, different, single database files (instead of, for example, separate files for each and every single email) to save HDD space. A single app would also mean only one app open instead of three, when all three are needed at once. As a single app, enhancements can be made, such as adding a project manager, a notes sub app that integrates nicely with the iPhone, an email campaign manager for small businesses, etc…

I appreciate your time, and hope that you consider these suggestions.

Thank you,
Phillip

No Comments »



March 31st, 2010 by Phillip Ginn

So, 4-24-2010 is on the horizon, and the month that was March took a lot out of me, schedule-wise. Being indoor percussion competition season in the NCBA, and Easter being this weekend, our entire season was condensed into a compact month, and I was half-asleep for most of that month as a result.

Payday has been sitting on my drafting table for that month, relatively untouched. I took to sleeping in, to be quite honest, in order to not be too tired at night for rehearsals and lessons. Now that it’s over, I expect to resume drawing in the morning. However, the time away from the drawing board has given me time to think… again.

I will continue to work on Payday, of course. I would be remiss in not finishing it, after spending all that time completing what pencilled pages I’ve finished. However, I’ve thought about in what capacity I would consider Payday to be completed? Should I continued until the very end? That’s what I would like, but considering I only draw for an hour/hour-and-a-half each weekday morning, that could take quite some time (and it already has).

I could take what exists and turn it into a short story, but it would lose the intended impact if I got rid of the ending, which hasn’t been drawn yet.

What will end up happening instead is that I will continue to work on it during the week until 4-24-2010. Then, I’ll take whatever needs to be completed and move it to the weekends to make room during the week for another, more immediately achievable project. A project involving a format that isn’t really a priority to me in the world of comics; I’ve said before that what I really want to do is graphic novels. However, this new project is conducive to working for a short periods in the mornings, the output is greater and faster, it will sate my need to do comics, and the idea I have is interesting, entertaining, and has enough fantasy elements to give me a platform to explore different stories and keep me interested, long term. All of this is important to me because, right now, I need the immediate output and the more immediate achievability to balance out the long-term, gradual achievability of working on a graphic novel. And we all know that a good amount of output is important in the comic world. Plus, because I would be working quicker, the project would not get in the way of doing graphic novels on the side.

That’s right. Provided I go through with my grand scheme, I shall be making a return to webcomics.

No Comments »




January 23rd, 2010 by Phillip Ginn

There’s this disaster in Haiti that’s making the news. They had a devastating earthquake that will take a lot of time, effort, and money to recover from.

So why should we care about a late-night brouhaha on NBC? Why should we care about Jay Leno, villain’s sidesick, and Conan O’Brien, former (as of 1-22-2010) host of the Tonight Show?

I can think of two reasons off the top of my head.

One, which is a personal reason, is that it angers me that stupidity and selfishness would be so prominent in our entertainment and affect so many people. This is nothing new, and it’s something we should be used to, not to mention the fact that everyone can be stupid and everyone is at least just a little selfish. Actions based on stupidity and selfishness are the fault of humans and can be controlled if just a little thought was put behind them. The earthquake in Haiti? A natural disaster, not a man-made disaster. It’s something that couldn’t be prevented, unless we somehow develop the technology to stabilize tectonic plates. NBC’s blunder in changing their late night strategy? That could’ve been prevented. Leno’s lap-dog, and seemingly selfish, actions of going along with the boss, essentially ousting O’Brien? That could’ve been prevented. Causing a couple hundred people to move from New York to Los Angeles to work on the show, only to put them out of a job seven months later? That could’ve been prevented.

In the grand scheme of things, this is a pretty ridiculous story to write about three time, in my case. It’s ridiculous to get upset over. But for some reason, I am attracted to this story about stupidity and selfishness because, though it happens every day, my mind can’t wrap around the fact that people act this way.

I have no idea what really happened behind the scene, only what has been reported. But I can tell you that comparing O’Brien’s Tonight Show ratings to Leno’s final Tonight Show ratings is an illogical, unfair, and uneven comparison when you take into account a) Leno had years to build his audience and ratings; b) Leno’s 10 PM prime time show was such a failure, is was a bad lead-in to the local news, which had ratings drops, which lead into and affect O’Brien’s Tonight Show; c) Leno’s ratings were bad his first few years, but after those first few years he started to beat David Letterman in the ratings. Dick Ebersol, NBC Universal’s Chairman of Sports and Olympics, called O’Brien “chicken-hearted and gutless” and “an astounding failure”, and went on to compare O’Brien’s Tonight Show ratings to Leno’s final Tonight Show ratings. This is an executive at a huge TV Network? A man who can’t recognize the lack of logic in his point-of-view? This is a guy who is a frequent consultant on changes NBC makes to their late-night lineup?

I’ve already commented on Leno being the villain’s (NBC) sidekick, so I’ll leave it at that.

This leads me to my second reason, which is that people love a story about good and bad.

Think about this. Aside from the looting and criminal behavior of some in Haiti, which is really a string of stories within a story of the horrible earthquake, the devastation in Haiti has no villain. It’s a story of a country being a victim of a natural disaster. It’s not a story of good VS bad. It’s simply a story of natural disaster.

The story of NBC, Leno, and O’Brien? This story has “good” guys and “bad” guys – you can choose the side you want, and that’s really the appeal. If you’re reading, you know what side I’ve chosen. And some people have chosen Leno’s side. Hell, some people have made all three parties to be the bad guys, viewing them as rich brats that are fighting over a TV show. This is the appeal. This is the reason we, the audience, follow the story so intently, with so much opinionated involvement, because we get to choose sides and root for our good guy. The disaster in Haiti? Well, I guess you can choose sides… Pat Robertson chose the side of God when he “explained” that Haiti was turned to rubble because of its pact with the Devil. So yeah, I guess you could choose sides in the story of Haiti’s earthquake. But most people wouldn’t. Most people would recognize it as a tragic event.

People love a story with good VS bad. They want to choose sides. And they love a controversy. This is why we follow. Our following of the NBC/Leno/O’Brien debacle doesn’t belittle what’s happening in Haiti, nor does it mean we’re not paying attention to it. It’s simply another story to follow, something we can get ridiculously riled up about and make our own.

As an aside, I just wanted to say that O’Brien’s last Tonight Show was wonderful. He’s witty, talented, intelligent, and fun to watch. He went out with a bang and I will be watching when he returns to television (hopefully with the same theme song; hopefully NBC didn’t keep the rights to it). I never really watched Leno in the first place, except when he had a guest I really wanted to watch, and even then my viewing was rare. In the future, I may watch because of a guest or out of morbid curiosity, but I await the day when Leno takes a backseat to someone new, someone fresh, someone like O’Brien. In fact, I see Conan beating Leno in the ratings given enough time, and all NBC will be able to do is watch the future they let go.

No Comments »



January 15th, 2010 by Phillip Ginn

…but he is the sidekick.

I don’t know what Jay Leno’s motivation for going along with NBC upcoming late night programming shift, but I do know that going along with it isn’t a show of class. This is NBC’s mess, and Leno is aiding its happening. That’s what a sidekick does: he aids the main villain.

Recently, Leno made a joke about how this controversy has helped increase Conan O’Brien’s ratings. I cry foul on this one. Perhaps Jay needs a reminder that when he took over for Johnny Carson on the Tonight Show, he trailed behind David Letterman in the ratings for the first two years. Eventually, he won the ratings in that time slot, but not without time.

By the same token, O’Brien’s Late Night show needed time to find its stride and its audience, something it eventually gained.

The seven months of low ratings with O’Brien on the Tonight Show isn’t logically comparable to the kind of ratings Leno was receiving after his first few years on the Tonight Show. NBC gave Leno time. They did not give O’Brien time. So to accuse O’Brien of having a failure of a Tonight Show is a false accusation. NBC is the one to accuse.

Of course, it’s hard to judge O’Brien’s Tonight Show ratings anyway, since it is supposedly the Jay Leno Show that contributed to lower ratings of NBC affiliate’s news programming, which in turn supposedly contributed to low Tonight Show ratings. Returning Leno to the Tonight Show, if that happens, won’t prove O’Brien to be at fault, nor will it prove that NBC made a good decision to revamp its late night lineup. It will defeat NBC’s original purpose: to not lose Leno or O’Brien as network personalities. The network will be moving backwards, not forwards. And it will follow the same bad decision that, unfortunately, plagues much of television nowadays, which is that time is not something new shows can afford.

But, I digress…

Leno left the Tonight Show and wanted a smooth transition to happen when O’Brien took over. By going along with NBC’s shake up, Leno has essentially become an Indian giver, taking back the 11:35 time slot. O’Brien has stated that doing the Tonight Show at 12:05 AM would be, amongst other things, unfair to Jimmy Fallon, current show of Late Night, which airs after the Tonight Show. That’s class. That shows understanding that his actions affect others.

Without this show of class, Leno fills role as the villain’s sidekick. As long as he stays in this role, it won’t matter how many people would love to see his return to the Tonight Show. He’s added his villain’s sidekick role to his legacy. This lack of class will be one of the things he’ll be remembered for, tainting his long, high-ratings run on the Tonight Show.

No Comments »